Skip to content

Est. 2011·Microsoft Partner 7033487·Delivery under 3 min·Support 7 days a week

Your vault is empty.

Review

Planner and Project Plan 3 Review 2026: The Manager’s Working Licence

9 min read Updated October 5, 2026 Microsoft Product Reviews

Fix it now

Project Plan 3 is now Planner and Project Plan 3, and it is still the schedule owner’s licence: the Project desktop application, baselines, critical path, advanced dependencies and the ability to create portfolios. What has changed is the other half of it. The Project Online side retires on 30 September 2026.

  1. Buy it for the person who builds and defends a schedule: baselines, critical path, advanced dependencies with lead and lag, and a desktop application that can hold a large dependent plan.
  2. Buy it if you want the desktop client and the shared Planner service under one per-user subscription rather than two purchases.
  3. Buy it if contributors on Planner Plan 1 need to update their own work inside plans the schedule owner maintains.
  4. Skip it for team members who only move tasks along. Planner Plan 1 covers them and mixing the two tiers is the intended design.
  5. Skip it if planning is offline, file-based and lives on one machine. A perpetual Project licence does that without a recurring charge.
  6. Do not buy it for Project Online. Timesheets, resource engagements and Project Web App reporting all sit there, and Project Online retires on 30 September 2026.

Microsoft states the Project desktop applications continue to be available and supported for both existing and new customers. It is Project Online, the server-side service behind Project Web App, that is being withdrawn.

If that settles it you can stop here. If you need the dates, and which half of the licence survives them, keep reading.

Why it happens

This tier has had two things happen to it. In September 2024 Microsoft renamed Project Plan 3 to Planner and Project Plan 3. Then, more consequentially, it set an end date on Project Online: end of sale on 1 October 2025, no new Project Web App sites from 1 April 2026, and retirement on 30 September 2026. Half of what this licence has historically been bought for sits on the wrong side of that date, and any review written before it is describing a product that no longer exists in the same shape.

Start with the half that survives, because it is the better half. Plan 3 carries the Project desktop application, which is the full scheduling engine: task calendars, baselines, resource assignments, levelling and a critical path you can defend in a meeting. It is a per-user subscription rather than a per-device licence, so one person covers the machines they work on. Alongside it you get the premium Planner experience of Plan 1 plus task history, the assignments view, the ability to create portfolios rather than only view them, baselines and critical path in the browser, and advanced dependencies with lead and lag.

The half that is going is everything that lived on the server. Project Online is where timesheets and timesheet approvals ran, where resource engagement requests were submitted and approved, and where the out-of-box and custom reporting, dashboards and portals sat. Microsoft has published the retirement date and has already stopped new Project Web App site creation. If your reason for holding Plan 3 is any of those, you are on a clock and the sensible move is to work out where that process goes next rather than to renew and hope.

There is also a licensing detail that older advice regularly gets wrong. Plan 3 gives resource engagements on a submit-only basis; reviewing, fulfilling and approving them, and resource capacity planning across the organisation, are Plan 5 capabilities in Microsoft’s own service description. So the common claim that Plan 3 lets you see who is committed where is only half true, and it was always a Project Online feature in any case.

Set against a perpetual Project licence the comparison is unchanged and still decided by how you work rather than by arithmetic. If planning is offline, file-based and owned by one person on one machine, the perpetual licence does that job and stops the recurring cost. The moment the team is expected to update its own tasks, or one person works across a laptop and a desk machine, the subscription wins. Plan for a mixture: schedule owners on Plan 3, contributors on Plan 1, and anyone whose planning never leaves a single PC on a perpetual licence.

The blunt summary is that Plan 3 in 2026 is a very good desktop scheduling licence with a premium Planner service attached, and that this is now the whole of it. Judge it on that and it holds up. Judge it on the enterprise project server it used to include and you will be disappointed on a published date.

Full reference

What each tier carries after the rename

Capability Planner Plan 1 Planner and Project Plan 3 Planner and Project Plan 5
Premium Planner: Timeline, dependencies, goals, sprints Yes Yes Yes
Portfolios View only Create Create
Task history and assignments view No Yes Yes
Baselines, critical path, advanced dependencies No Yes Yes
Project desktop application No Yes Yes
Project Online timesheets and approvals No Yes, until retirement Yes, until retirement
Resource engagements No Submit only Submit, review, fulfil and approve
Portfolio analysis and resource capacity planning No No Yes, until retirement

The dates that decide this purchase

Date What happens
August 2025 Project for the web retired. Its plans open in Planner, with no migration and no licensing change
1 October 2025 Project Online end of sale
1 April 2026 New Project Web App site creation restricted
30 September 2026 Project Online retires

The desktop application is not on that list, and that is the point. Microsoft states that the Project desktop products remain available and supported for existing and new customers. What is being withdrawn is the server that sat behind Project Web App, along with the timesheet, resource engagement and enterprise reporting machinery it hosted.

If your Plan 3 estate depends on Project Web App

  1. List every process that currently runs in Project Web App: timesheets, resource requests, status reporting, project intake, any custom dashboard.
  2. For each one, name the person who would notice if it stopped. That list is your migration scope, and it is usually shorter than the feature list suggests.
  3. Export the data you will need to keep before the retirement date rather than after it.
  4. Rebuild the scheduling and collaboration parts in Planner, which is where Microsoft has moved the investment.
  5. Treat timesheets and formal portfolio analysis as separate problems needing separate answers, because Planner does not currently replace them.
  6. Do not create new Project Web App sites. That route closed on 1 April 2026.

Plan 3 against a perpetual Project licence

How you work The licence that fits
One person, one machine, files only, no team updates Perpetual Project Professional
One person working across a laptop and a desktop Plan 3, because the subscription follows the user
A manager plus contributors who update their own tasks Plan 3 for the manager, Planner Plan 1 for the contributors
A team that only needs a shared task list The Planner already in your Microsoft 365 subscription

Buying without over-buying

  • Count the people who actually build schedules, not the people who attend project meetings. In most organisations that number is small and stable.
  • Licences are per user and mix freely, so a mixed estate of Plan 3, Plan 1 and the included Planner is normal rather than untidy.
  • Ask for the entitlement list on the quote. The tier you know as Project Plan 3 appears under the Planner name now, and the two are still both in circulation.
  • Review assignments before a renewal. Manager-tier seats are the ones that stay allocated to people who moved on.
  • If somebody is being licensed for timesheets, stop and price a timesheet product instead.

When a licence is the actual fix

Planner and Project Plan 3 is the correct licence for the people who build and defend schedules, and after the Project Online retirement it is best understood as a desktop scheduling licence with premium Planner attached. Arco supplies Planner Plan 1, Planner and Project Plan 3 and the perpetual Project editions, and the useful conversation before you order is a headcount of actual schedulers, because the standard mistake is buying manager seats for a whole team. Tell us how many people build plans, how many only update tasks and whether anyone works offline. If any part of your case for this tier is Project Online timesheets or Project Web App reporting, say so, because that is a separate problem with a published end date and we would rather flag it than sell around it.

Questions people ask about this

Is Planner and Project Plan 3 the same as Project Plan 3?

Yes. Microsoft renamed it in September 2024, along with Plan 1 and Plan 5. The entitlements did not change at the rename; what changed since is the retirement of Project Online, which removes the server-side capabilities from this licence on 30 September 2026.

Do I lose the Project desktop application when Project Online retires?

No. Microsoft states that the Project desktop products continue to be available and supported for both existing and new customers. The retirement is of Project Online, the service behind Project Web App, and of the timesheet, resource engagement and enterprise reporting features hosted there.

Does Plan 3 let me see resource capacity across projects?

Only partly, and this is a common misreading. Microsoft’s service description gives Plan 3 resource engagements on a submit-only basis, and reserves reviewing, fulfilling and approving them, plus resource capacity planning, for Plan 5. Both are Project Online features, so both are affected by the retirement.

Can Plan 3 and Plan 1 users work on the same plan?

Yes, and it is the intended design. The schedule owner maintains the plan with the full client while contributors update their own tasks in the browser. Licence each person for the role they perform, not for the team they belong to.

Is the subscription better value than a perpetual Project licence?

It depends on how you work. Offline, single-machine, file-based planning favours the perpetual licence. Shared plans, team updates and one person working across two machines favour the subscription, because it follows the user rather than the device. Get both quoted and compare over the years you would keep the software.

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve our documentation.

Related articles

Review Windows Server 2025 Essentials Review: Small-Business Server, No CALs Review Azure Virtual Desktop Review: Flexible, Powerful and Harder to Budget Review Planner Plan 1 Review: The Renamed Project Plan 1, for Team Members Review Microsoft Entra ID P2 Review: Risk-Based Identity Protection Assessed
← Back to Knowledge Base